This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, pitrou, rhettinger |
| Date | 2008年04月26日.00:22:41 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.09262578 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1209169362.85.0.16672131774.issue2603@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
With respect to range_eq8_normalize2.patch, it is unusual to have a function that consumes a reference to its argument. I would combine normalize_stop with PyNumber_Index and make it similar to validate_step with respect to reference counting. Note that if you choose stop = start + len*step normaization, you will not need to create 'one' in normalize_stop. With your patch I see >>> range(0,6,2) range(0, 6, 2) >>> range(0,5,2) range(0, 5, 2) I would expect one of these ranges normalized. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年04月26日 00:22:43 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.0926258 -> 0.09262578 recipients: + belopolsky, gvanrossum, georg.brandl, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, benjamin.peterson |
| 2008年04月26日 00:22:42 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.0926258 -> 0.0926258 messageid: <1209169362.85.0.16672131774.issue2603@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年04月26日 00:22:42 | belopolsky | link | issue2603 messages |
| 2008年04月26日 00:22:41 | belopolsky | create | |