This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | benjamin.peterson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, pitrou, rhettinger |
| Date | 2008年04月25日.22:36:46 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.05675611 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1209163010.69.0.702141445677.issue2603@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Thanks for the help. Yes, after thinking for a while, I decided that range equality should represent the set of integers and not the values in the constructor. Normalization would be a good idea, but I think that's another issue I'll tackle after this. Now you get an error for hashing a huge range. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年04月25日 22:36:51 | benjamin.peterson | set | spambayes_score: 0.0567561 -> 0.05675611 recipients: + benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, georg.brandl, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, pitrou |
| 2008年04月25日 22:36:50 | benjamin.peterson | set | spambayes_score: 0.0567561 -> 0.0567561 messageid: <1209163010.69.0.702141445677.issue2603@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年04月25日 22:36:49 | benjamin.peterson | link | issue2603 messages |
| 2008年04月25日 22:36:49 | benjamin.peterson | create | |