This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | ajaksu2 |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ajaksu2, rhettinger |
| Date | 2008年04月02日.10:48:01 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.016119294 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1207133284.49.0.529226014419.issue2536@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Currently, Modules/itertoolsmodule.c lines 2471-2475 are: PyDoc_STRVAR(permutations_doc, "permutations(iterables[, r]) --> permutations object\n\ \n\ Return successive r-length permutations of elements in the iterable.\n\n\ permutations(range(4), 3) --> (0,1,2), (0,1,3), (0,2,3), (1,2,3)"); but that describes behavior of itertools.combinations. The correct example is in a comment on line 2254 of the same file: 'permutations(range(3), 2) --> (0,1) (0,2) (1,0) (1,2) (2,0) (2,1)' I used "misleading" instead of "wrong" because the current docstring does show a subset of the real output and could be said to be incomplete. If that is the case, I suggest being explicit: 'permutations(range(4), 3) --> (0, 1, 2), (0, 1, 3), (0, 2, 1), (0, 2, 3), (0, 3, 1), (0, 3, 2), (1, 0, 2), (1, 0, 3), (1, 2, 0), (1, 2, 3), (1, 3, 0), (1, 3, 2), (2, 0, 1), (2, 0, 3), (2, 1, 0), (2, 1, 3), (2, 3, 0), (2, 3, 1), (3, 0, 1), (3, 0, 2), (3, 1, 0), (3, 1, 2), (3, 2, 0), (3, 2, 1)' |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年04月02日 10:48:04 | ajaksu2 | set | spambayes_score: 0.0161193 -> 0.016119294 recipients: + ajaksu2, rhettinger |
| 2008年04月02日 10:48:04 | ajaksu2 | set | spambayes_score: 0.0161193 -> 0.0161193 messageid: <1207133284.49.0.529226014419.issue2536@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年04月02日 10:48:02 | ajaksu2 | link | issue2536 messages |
| 2008年04月02日 10:48:01 | ajaksu2 | create | |