This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, christian.heimes, ivazquez, jafo |
| Date | 2008年03月27日.14:31:01 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.10282198 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1206628263.1.0.583069497258.issue1294959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Placing the entire library tree in /usr/lib64 is wasteful on dual 32/64bit installation, but placing just the C modules there is contrary to python import logic and may cause problems to relative imports. I have suggested what I believed was a workable solution: have 64-bit python search lib64-dynload subdirectories instead of lib-dynload. See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-April/072653.html Currently $(prefix)/pythonX.Y/lib-dynload is inserted in the sys.path, but I think it would be better to handle this inside the importer in a way similar to how the importer looks for both foo.so and foomodule.so when importing foo. This would allow submodules and user modules treated the same way. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年03月27日 14:31:03 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.102822 -> 0.10282198 recipients: + belopolsky, jafo, christian.heimes, ivazquez |
| 2008年03月27日 14:31:03 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.102822 -> 0.102822 messageid: <1206628263.1.0.583069497258.issue1294959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年03月27日 14:31:02 | belopolsky | link | issue1294959 messages |
| 2008年03月27日 14:31:01 | belopolsky | create | |