This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, exarkun, gvanrossum, lpd, rhettinger |
| Date | 2008年03月24日.17:29:20 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.030502347 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1206379762.22.0.0476323865389.issue1733184@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I hate to flip-flop like this, but please consider my new arguments at issue2268. In short, slices being unhashable prevents storing them in the code object's const dictionary and thus prevents optimizing code involving const slices. Unless I hear strong opposition from the bug tracker forum, I plan to present some ideas on python-dev on how to make slices hashable while not enabling d[:]. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年03月24日 17:29:22 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.0305023 -> 0.030502347 recipients: + belopolsky, gvanrossum, rhettinger, lpd, exarkun |
| 2008年03月24日 17:29:22 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.0305023 -> 0.0305023 messageid: <1206379762.22.0.0476323865389.issue1733184@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年03月24日 17:29:20 | belopolsky | link | issue1733184 messages |
| 2008年03月24日 17:29:20 | belopolsky | create | |