Message 64404 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	rhettinger
Recipients	belopolsky, rhettinger
Date	2008年03月24日.08:53:20
SpamBayes Score	0.058314543
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1206348800.91.0.18759646695.issue2172@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
I'm not sure the class docstring approach is suitable for a mixin. It seems fine to me that pydoc strips the commentary on the mixin as a standalone class; instead it appropriately focuses on the client class that uses the mixin as part of its API. FWIW, all of this code goes away in Py3.0.

Content

I'm not sure the class docstring approach is suitable for a mixin. It 
seems fine to me that pydoc strips the commentary on the mixin as a 
standalone class; instead it appropriately focuses on the client class 
that uses the mixin as part of its API.
FWIW, all of this code goes away in Py3.0.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008年03月24日 08:53:21	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.0583145 -> 0.058314543 recipients: + rhettinger, belopolsky
2008年03月24日 08:53:20	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.0583145 -> 0.0583145 messageid: <1206348800.91.0.18759646695.issue2172@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008年03月24日 08:53:20	rhettinger	link	issue2172 messages
2008年03月24日 08:53:20	rhettinger	create

homepage