This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | paul.moore |
|---|---|
| Recipients | paul.moore, pje |
| Date | 2008年03月20日.23:55:31 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.13743638 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1206057333.58.0.377743936853.issue2439@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Is that true? loader.load_module(pkg) should return sys.modules[pkg] without reloading if it already exists. See PEP 302 "Specification part 1: The Importer Protocol": The load_module() method has a few responsibilities that it must fulfil *before* it runs any code: - If there is an existing module object named 'fullname' in sys.modules, the loader must use that existing module. (Otherwise, the reload() builtin will not work correctly.) If a module named 'fullname' does not exist in sys.modules, the loader must create a new module object and add it to sys.modules. I've added a test for this, but I'm not 100% sure it's right. It certainly works with unchanged code. If you can make it fail, let me know and I'll work up a fix. But I think repeated calls to load_module() should be safe (assuming loaders work as required by PEP 302). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年03月20日 23:55:33 | paul.moore | set | spambayes_score: 0.137436 -> 0.13743638 recipients: + paul.moore, pje |
| 2008年03月20日 23:55:33 | paul.moore | set | spambayes_score: 0.137436 -> 0.137436 messageid: <1206057333.58.0.377743936853.issue2439@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年03月20日 23:55:32 | paul.moore | link | issue2439 messages |
| 2008年03月20日 23:55:32 | paul.moore | create | |