This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | rhettinger |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ajaksu2, alanmcintyre, avalind, dtorp, ilan, jafo, mark.dickinson, phr, rhettinger |
| Date | 2008年03月18日.00:47:24 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.26527804 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1205801245.28.0.862440894203.issue2138@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Problems with product(): It is dreadfully inefficient compared to a good implementation of factorial. It has the same name a new itertool with much different functionality. The hyper-generalization takes us further away from the OP's dirt simple request for a piece of functionality that is widely understood, frequently reimplemented, and has a near zero learning curve. If his request is accepted, it does not preclude you from making some other module with tons of functions of interest to encryption people, number theorists, and statisticians. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年03月18日 00:47:25 | rhettinger | set | spambayes_score: 0.265278 -> 0.26527804 recipients: + rhettinger, jafo, phr, mark.dickinson, dtorp, alanmcintyre, ajaksu2, avalind, ilan |
| 2008年03月18日 00:47:25 | rhettinger | set | spambayes_score: 0.265278 -> 0.265278 messageid: <1205801245.28.0.862440894203.issue2138@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年03月18日 00:47:24 | rhettinger | link | issue2138 messages |
| 2008年03月18日 00:47:24 | rhettinger | create | |