This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum |
| Date | 2008年03月18日.00:44:09 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.03604142 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1205801050.74.0.577315916295.issue2374@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Let's not do this. This approach is not sufficiently backwards compatible; it will break any code that uses isinstance(x, file). Even though that's not forward compatible with 3.0, it works in 2.5 and before, so it should not break in 2.6. Together with my previous remark this means that we should just not mess with this. (PS: I don't understand what you say about distutils.text_file -- from your patch it looks like the only way it can issue this warning is if it actually calls the file() builtin...) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年03月18日 00:44:10 | gvanrossum | set | spambayes_score: 0.0360414 -> 0.03604142 recipients: + gvanrossum, benjamin.peterson |
| 2008年03月18日 00:44:10 | gvanrossum | set | spambayes_score: 0.0360414 -> 0.0360414 messageid: <1205801050.74.0.577315916295.issue2374@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年03月18日 00:44:10 | gvanrossum | link | issue2374 messages |
| 2008年03月18日 00:44:09 | gvanrossum | create | |