This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | amaury.forgeotdarc |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, gvanrossum, jek, rhettinger |
| Date | 2008年03月05日.00:05:33 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.12366192 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1204675534.46.0.248429057265.issue2235@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I noticed that my patch uses Py_TYPE(self)->tp_hash, whereas normal processing of slot_tp_hash() uses lookup_method(self,"__hash__",hash_str). I am almost sure that both expressions return the same value. Is this correct? Py_TYPE(self)->tp_hash seems much faster. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年03月05日 00:05:34 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | spambayes_score: 0.123662 -> 0.12366192 recipients: + amaury.forgeotdarc, gvanrossum, rhettinger, jek |
| 2008年03月05日 00:05:34 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | spambayes_score: 0.123662 -> 0.123662 messageid: <1204675534.46.0.248429057265.issue2235@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年03月05日 00:05:33 | amaury.forgeotdarc | link | issue2235 messages |
| 2008年03月05日 00:05:33 | amaury.forgeotdarc | create | |