This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | facundobatista, gvanrossum, jyasskin, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, rhettinger |
| Date | 2008年02月28日.02:16:20 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0543812 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1204164982.52.0.54443543404.issue1682@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'm wondering what there is left to do here. Are we close to being able to close this issue? Some thoughts: (1) I think the docs could use a little work (just expanding, and giving a few examples). But it doesn't seem urgent that this gets done before the next round of alphas. (2) Looking at it, I'm really not sure that implementing Rational.__format__ is worthwhile; it's not obvious that we need a way to format a Rational as a float. So I'm -0 on this. If others think Rational should have a __format__ method I'm still happy to implement it. Is there much else that needs to be done here? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年02月28日 02:16:22 | mark.dickinson | set | spambayes_score: 0.0543812 -> 0.0543812 recipients: + mark.dickinson, gvanrossum, rhettinger, facundobatista, ncoghlan, jyasskin |
| 2008年02月28日 02:16:22 | mark.dickinson | set | spambayes_score: 0.0543812 -> 0.0543812 messageid: <1204164982.52.0.54443543404.issue1682@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年02月28日 02:16:21 | mark.dickinson | link | issue1682 messages |
| 2008年02月28日 02:16:21 | mark.dickinson | create | |