This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, rhettinger |
| Date | 2008年02月26日.03:03:14 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.010359262 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1203994995.71.0.501615424862.issue2186@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I think the motivation behind your other use case will likey be > addressed in a more general way with an identify function being > added to the operator module. Quite true, but I thought operator.identity was dead and buried. Can you update issue1673203 if some decision was made? Note that in msg55022 I said: "If [the identity] proposal is accepted, it will make sense to deprecate the use of None as an identity function in map." So there may be no disagreement at all. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年02月26日 03:03:16 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.0103593 -> 0.010359262 recipients: + belopolsky, gvanrossum, rhettinger, benjamin.peterson |
| 2008年02月26日 03:03:15 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.0103593 -> 0.0103593 messageid: <1203994995.71.0.501615424862.issue2186@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年02月26日 03:03:14 | belopolsky | link | issue2186 messages |
| 2008年02月26日 03:03:14 | belopolsky | create | |