This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | jyasskin |
|---|---|
| Recipients | facundobatista, gvanrossum, jyasskin, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, rhettinger |
| Date | 2008年02月14日.07:21:57 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.3707742 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1202973719.87.0.796973531225.issue1682@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
r60785 speeds the benchmark up from 10.536s to 4.910s (on top of whatever my __instancecheck__ fix did). Here are the remaining interesting-looking calls: ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function) ... 1 0.207 0.207 4.999 4.999 {sum} 199996 1.587 0.000 3.419 0.000 fractions.py:58(__new__) 99997 0.170 0.000 3.236 0.000 fractions.py:295(forward) 99998 0.641 0.000 2.881 0.000 fractions.py:322(_add) 99999 0.202 0.000 1.556 0.000 benchmark.py:3(<genexpr>) 199996 0.829 0.000 0.829 0.000 fractions.py:17(gcd) 199996 0.477 0.000 0.757 0.000 abc.py:63(__new__) 399993 0.246 0.000 0.246 0.000 abc.py:164(__instancecheck__) 199996 0.207 0.000 0.207 0.000 {method 'get' of 'dictproxy' objects} 100071 0.185 0.000 0.185 0.000 {isinstance} 399990 0.109 0.000 0.109 0.000 fractions.py:200(denominator) 200004 0.073 0.000 0.073 0.000 {built-in method __new__ of type object at 0xfeea0} 199995 0.065 0.000 0.065 0.000 fractions.py:196(numerator) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年02月14日 07:22:00 | jyasskin | set | spambayes_score: 0.370774 -> 0.3707742 recipients: + jyasskin, gvanrossum, rhettinger, facundobatista, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan |
| 2008年02月14日 07:21:59 | jyasskin | set | spambayes_score: 0.370774 -> 0.370774 messageid: <1202973719.87.0.796973531225.issue1682@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年02月14日 07:21:58 | jyasskin | link | issue1682 messages |
| 2008年02月14日 07:21:58 | jyasskin | create | |