Message62133
| Author |
janssen |
| Recipients |
christian.heimes, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, josiahcarlson |
| Date |
2008年02月07日.04:08:35 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00022595121 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4b3e516a0802062008mf048b73sa23319749b600a83@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<4b3e516a0802062008v40b406e0l4b1619243c66b8b8@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content |
Sorry, I meant to say, "so things without input FDs can make progress".
On Feb 6, 2008 8:08 PM, Bill Janssen <bill.janssen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, that's it exactly. So things without work tasks can still get done.
>
> But timers are the important thing. With timers you can always implement
> work tasks by yourself.
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2008 12:49 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment:
> >
> > I still don't get it. Maybe you're talking about something like "call a
> > function at the next select() loop" which in Twisted is equal to:
> > >>> reactor.callLater(0, something)
> >
> > By using my patched asyncore you can do the same with:
> > >>> self.call_later(0, something)
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue2006>
> > __________________________________
> >
>
> |
| Files |
| File name |
Uploaded |
|
unnamed
|
janssen,
2008年02月07日.04:08:34
|
|