Message62132
| Author |
janssen |
| Recipients |
christian.heimes, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, josiahcarlson |
| Date |
2008年02月07日.04:08:07 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.00045229224 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<4b3e516a0802062008v40b406e0l4b1619243c66b8b8@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1202330959.67.0.546218356035.issue2006@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
Yes, that's it exactly. So things without work tasks can still get done.
But timers are the important thing. With timers you can always implement
work tasks by yourself.
On Feb 6, 2008 12:49 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment:
>
> I still don't get it. Maybe you're talking about something like "call a
> function at the next select() loop" which in Twisted is equal to:
> >>> reactor.callLater(0, something)
>
> By using my patched asyncore you can do the same with:
> >>> self.call_later(0, something)
>
> __________________________________
> Tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2006>
> __________________________________
> |
| Files |
|---|
| File name |
Uploaded |
|
unnamed
|
janssen,
2008年02月07日.04:08:05
|
|