This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | lemburg, orivej, pitrou |
| Date | 2008年01月27日.19:03:09 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.02377089 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1201460590.16.0.369302690305.issue1943@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I know it's not the place to discuss #1629305, but the join() solution is not always faster. Why? Because 1) there's the list contruction and method call overhead 2) ceval.c has some bytecode hackery to try and make plain concatenations somewhat less slow. As for cStringIO, I actually observed in some experiments that it was slower than the other alternatives, at least for short strings. All in all, choosing between the three idioms is far from obvious and needs case-by-case analysis. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年01月27日 19:03:10 | pitrou | set | spambayes_score: 0.0237709 -> 0.02377089 recipients: + pitrou, lemburg, orivej |
| 2008年01月27日 19:03:10 | pitrou | set | spambayes_score: 0.0237709 -> 0.0237709 messageid: <1201460590.16.0.369302690305.issue1943@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年01月27日 19:03:09 | pitrou | link | issue1943 messages |
| 2008年01月27日 19:03:09 | pitrou | create | |