homepage

Christian: I'm definitely not proposing atanh(1) = inf: it should raise 
ValueError. I'm proposing that we follow Tim's rules for now; this means no 
change for finite inputs.
The new thing here is that since you've made inf and nan more accessible and 
consistent across platforms, I think we should make sure that the math functions 
do the right thing for an *input* of +/-inf or nan. I'm almost sure that the 
current behavior of e.g. exp(float("inf")) is more-or-less accidental rather 
than designed.
I think I'm missing the point of your math.atanh(.999...) example.
.99999999999999999 *is* already exactly equal to 1.0, so you're just proving 
that math.atanh(1.0) currently gives a ValueError. (Which, again, I think is 
the right thing to do.)
>>> x = .99999999999999999
>>> x == 1.0
True
The atanh0022 result is definitely a bug: it looks like either asinh or log1p 
is buggy. I'll try to figure it out.