This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | tim.peters |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Rhamphoryncus, christian.heimes, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, tim.peters |
| Date | 2008年01月04日.03:51:25 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.17410327 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1199418685.94.0.940898681977.issue1640@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
The functionality of what was called (and I agree confusingly so) "sign()" here is supplied by "signbit()" in C99. That standard isn't free, but the relevant part is incorporated in the free Open Group standards: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/signbit.html The 754 standard says NaNs have sign bits, but assigns no meaning to them. In particular, the value of the sign bit of a NaN resulting from a string->double routine applied to the string "nan" isn't defined by 754, or (AFAICT) by C99 either. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008年01月04日 03:51:26 | tim.peters | set | spambayes_score: 0.174103 -> 0.17410327 recipients: + tim.peters, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, Rhamphoryncus, christian.heimes |
| 2008年01月04日 03:51:26 | tim.peters | set | spambayes_score: 0.174103 -> 0.174103 messageid: <1199418685.94.0.940898681977.issue1640@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008年01月04日 03:51:25 | tim.peters | link | issue1640 messages |
| 2008年01月04日 03:51:25 | tim.peters | create | |