Message59154
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
Rhamphoryncus, christian.heimes, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson |
| Date |
2008年01月03日.20:35:13 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.01748209 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<ca471dc20801031235u3e68c0d6s6bcf1facbffcebd9@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1199392155.37.0.611458347733.issue1640@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Why not implement copysign? It's a standard, familiar function with well-
> documented meaning all over the web, and it can easily be used to create
> whatever sign test is necessary, letting the user decide what results
> (s)he wants for +/-0, +/-nan, etc.
Good idea. Since you seem to like providing patches, can you create
one for math.copysign()? |
|