Message 59118 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	gvanrossum
Recipients	cosoleto, ggenellina, gvanrossum, josm, orsenthil, torriem
Date	2008年01月03日.01:50:08
SpamBayes Score	0.00081080117
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1199325008.79.0.589514345986.issue1205@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
I'm just following the last post's suggestion "Should we close this then?" My message (somebody "should" submit a patch) was sarcastic --- it was in reference to the comment that Python "should" be more practical. Since no patch was applied, I don't know why "won't fix" isn't a perfectly adequate description of the reason for closure. If you want me to reopen this, please submit a patch.

Content

I'm just following the last post's suggestion "Should we close this then?"
My message (somebody "should" submit a patch) was sarcastic --- it was
in reference to the comment that Python "should" be more practical.
Since no patch was applied, I don't know why "won't fix" isn't a
perfectly adequate description of the reason for closure.
If you want me to reopen this, please submit a patch.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008年01月03日 01:50:08	gvanrossum	set	spambayes_score: 0.000810801 -> 0.00081080117 recipients: + gvanrossum, ggenellina, orsenthil, josm, cosoleto, torriem
2008年01月03日 01:50:08	gvanrossum	set	spambayes_score: 0.000810801 -> 0.000810801 messageid: <1199325008.79.0.589514345986.issue1205@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008年01月03日 01:50:08	gvanrossum	link	issue1205 messages
2008年01月03日 01:50:08	gvanrossum	create

homepage