This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | therve |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, therve |
| Date | 2007年12月21日.10:36:26 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.040562928 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1198233387.57.0.208982771692.issue1657@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Here I go for kqueue: * the docstring of test_kqueue.py is wrong * the tests are a bit light. It would be good the have a test like test_control_and_wait in test_epoll. * the kqueue_queue_control (and the pyepoll_poll) are now completely wrong! You should not limit to FD_SETSIZE, these 2 systems are there because they're able to handle for fds than that. Also, this buffer thing looks like a premature optimization. I'm unable to tell if it's correct or not. * the NETDEV and related flags aren't defined under OS X 10.4. I guess there are flags for freebsd, but kqueue should build on OS X too. I've been able to use this module for the twisted reactor, so the functionality is OK. But thsi FD_SETSIZE limit is a huge problem. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2007年12月21日 10:36:27 | therve | set | spambayes_score: 0.0405629 -> 0.040562928 recipients: + therve, christian.heimes |
| 2007年12月21日 10:36:27 | therve | set | spambayes_score: 0.0405629 -> 0.0405629 messageid: <1198233387.57.0.208982771692.issue1657@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2007年12月21日 10:36:27 | therve | link | issue1657 messages |
| 2007年12月21日 10:36:26 | therve | create | |