Message58642
| Author |
taleinat |
| Recipients |
kbk, taleinat |
| Date |
2007年12月14日.23:33:18 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.31531888 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<1197675199.21.0.51008364465.issue1350@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Now for CallTipWindow.py:
* split conditionals into two lines as requested
* changed the test (took me a while to understand what "controversy" you
were referring to...)
I couldn't find anything wrong with the first line. It is the
function/method signature if it was found, or just the beginning of the
doc-string otherwise. Unless you think the adding the signature (when
possible) is unnecessary/confusing...
The above changes are included in both new patches. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2007年12月14日 23:33:19 | taleinat | set | spambayes_score: 0.315319 -> 0.31531888 recipients:
+ taleinat, kbk |
| 2007年12月14日 23:33:19 | taleinat | set | spambayes_score: 0.315319 -> 0.315319 messageid: <1197675199.21.0.51008364465.issue1350@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2007年12月14日 23:33:19 | taleinat | link | issue1350 messages |
| 2007年12月14日 23:33:18 | taleinat | create |
|