Message58441
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
draghuram, facundobatista, gvanrossum, init |
| Date |
2007年12月11日.17:24:03 |
| SpamBayes Score |
0.011714454 |
| Marked as misclassified |
No |
| Message-id |
<ca471dc20712110924i4279ede2p44802b17b001a403@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1197384825.11.0.248271009244.issue1577@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
> Since we already have os.rename, wouldn't it be better for shutil.move()
> to be closer to command line 'mv'? I think Facundo's approach should work.
I'd rather not do this. It might cause disasters for code that expects
the old semantics. If you want a way to do the "mv" semantics, propose
a new API.
shutil.move() still offers several things over os.rename(): deleting
the target even if os.rename() doesn't (it doesn't on Windows);
cross-filesystem moves implemented as copy. |
|