Message48759
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
| Date |
2005年09月23日.23:49:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
| Marked as misclassified |
| Message-id |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Logged In: YES
user_id=593130
The reason for this patch given in the referred-to post is:
"We have been told that this directory is inappropriate for vendor
supplied packages, just as "site_perl" is inappropriate for Perl.
With Perl, vendor supplied packages go under "vendor_perl". "
where 'this directory' is site-packages, which works fine.
The python-dev thread subequent to this posting starts with
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-
September/056682.html
A subsequent post
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-
September/056696.html
clarifies that 'vendor supplied packages' here means packages
installed by the system/OS vendor.
Disconnected (in the pipermail archives) pieces of the thread
start here
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-
September/056697.html
and here
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-
September/056702.html
This last suggests that this proposal is on hold while a .pth
solution is explored.
|
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2007年08月23日 15:43:57 | admin | link | issue1298835 messages |
| 2007年08月23日 15:43:57 | admin | create |
|