Message 45273 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Recipients
Author	atuining
Date	2004年06月22日.17:06:14
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to

Content
Logged In: YES user_id=619560 Yes, this has been a long time coming. Collaboration by e-mail with people working on completely different projects can be quite a challenge! Thanks for getting this checked in. When 2.4a1 comes out I will be providing a new version of cx_Oracle that takes advantage of these functions. I just noticed that I missed the macros that are defined in datetime.h that were not modified with my patch -- specifically those used to acquire the components of the date/time objects. Should those be documented as well? I'm assuming the answer is yes -- so would it be helpful if I did so and attached a patch to this set of patches or do I need to create a new patch?

Content

Logged In: YES 
user_id=619560
Yes, this has been a long time coming. Collaboration by
e-mail with people working on completely different projects
can be quite a challenge! Thanks for getting this checked
in. When 2.4a1 comes out I will be providing a new version
of cx_Oracle that takes advantage of these functions.
I just noticed that I missed the macros that are defined in
datetime.h that were not modified with my patch --
specifically those used to acquire the components of the
date/time objects. Should those be documented as well? I'm
assuming the answer is yes -- so would it be helpful if I
did so and attached a patch to this set of patches or do I
need to create a new patch?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007年08月23日 15:31:58	admin	link	issue876130 messages
2007年08月23日 15:31:58	admin	create

homepage