Message 416610 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	Mark.Shannon, brandtbucher, ncoghlan, pablogsal, vstinner
Date	2022年04月03日.05:27:27
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1648963648.11.0.526913878021.issue44800@roundup.psfhosted.org>

Content
Core dev forum thread: https://discuss.python.org/t/proposal-rename-pyinterpreterframe-struct-as-py-framedata/14213 The conclusion from the forum thread and associated PRs was that any of the further renaming proposed didn't provide sufficient additional clarity to justify further code churn in a semi public API. As a result, the final PR just documents the status quo in the internal C API frame header (since the conventions arising from the code-churn-minimising migration to a split data structure is hard to infer just from reading the code): https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/32281

Content

Core dev forum thread: https://discuss.python.org/t/proposal-rename-pyinterpreterframe-struct-as-py-framedata/14213
The conclusion from the forum thread and associated PRs was that any of the further renaming proposed didn't provide sufficient additional clarity to justify further code churn in a semi public API.
 As a result, the final PR just documents the status quo in the internal C API frame header (since the conventions arising from the code-churn-minimising migration to a split data structure is hard to infer just from reading the code): https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/32281

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2022年04月03日 05:27:28	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, vstinner, Mark.Shannon, pablogsal, brandtbucher
2022年04月03日 05:27:28	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <1648963648.11.0.526913878021.issue44800@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2022年04月03日 05:27:28	ncoghlan	link	issue44800 messages
2022年04月03日 05:27:27	ncoghlan	create

homepage