Message409991
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
M-Reimer, bsteffensmeier, corona10, eric.snow, erlendaasland, graysky, hroncok, miss-islington, ndjensen, petr.viktorin, shihai1991, uckelman, vstinner |
| Date |
2022年01月07日.17:45:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1641577500.22.0.922384349932.issue46070@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
In the 3.9 branch, the commit 4d2cfd354969590ba8e0af0447fd84f8b5e61952 fixed the _asyncio extension. win_py399_crash_reproducer.py still branch on Windows in the 3.9 branch. The code can be simplified with:
code = "import _sre"
Moreover, even if I modify PyInit__sre() to only call PyModule_Create(), it does still crash. I can still reproduce the crash with the following simplified _sre.c code:
---
static PyMethodDef _functions[] = {
_SRE_COMPILE_METHODDEF
{NULL, NULL}
};
static struct PyModuleDef sremodule = {
PyModuleDef_HEAD_INIT,
"_" SRE_MODULE,
NULL,
-1,
_functions,
NULL,
NULL,
NULL,
NULL
};
PyMODINIT_FUNC PyInit__sre(void)
{
return PyModule_Create(&sremodule);
}
---
If _SRE_COMPILE_METHODDEF is removd from _functions, the script no longer crash.
Is there something specific about method objects? Is it safe to share them between multiple interpreters? See my message msg408662 which gives some details. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2022年01月07日 17:45:00 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, petr.viktorin, eric.snow, ndjensen, hroncok, uckelman, corona10, miss-islington, shihai1991, erlendaasland, graysky, bsteffensmeier, M-Reimer |
| 2022年01月07日 17:45:00 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1641577500.22.0.922384349932.issue46070@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2022年01月07日 17:45:00 | vstinner | link | issue46070 messages |
| 2022年01月07日 17:45:00 | vstinner | create |
|