Message404756
| Author |
erlendaasland |
| Recipients |
erlendaasland, petr.viktorin, rhettinger, shihai1991 |
| Date |
2021年10月22日.11:44:58 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1634903098.59.0.16920693038.issue45113@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
>> Can I do something for this pending PEP?
>
> Ask Victor, he should know more. But as far as I know, no one started on it yet.
Quoting PEP 630 (active PEP):
Whenever this PEP mentions extension modules, the advice also applies to
built-in modules, such as the C parts of the standard library. The standard
library is expected to switch to per-module state early.
Why is not PEP 630 enough? (I find these "political" discussions a bit hard to follow sometimes :) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2021年10月22日 11:44:58 | erlendaasland | set | recipients:
+ erlendaasland, rhettinger, petr.viktorin, shihai1991 |
| 2021年10月22日 11:44:58 | erlendaasland | set | messageid: <1634903098.59.0.16920693038.issue45113@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021年10月22日 11:44:58 | erlendaasland | link | issue45113 messages |
| 2021年10月22日 11:44:58 | erlendaasland | create |
|