Message403418
| Author |
giampaolo.rodola |
| Recipients |
Albert.Zeyer, desbma, dulanic, giampaolo.rodola, koobs, pablogsal, vstinner |
| Date |
2021年10月07日.14:37:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1633617425.36.0.66626636792.issue37157@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> So using copy_file_range (if available) should be the most generic solution, which includes copy-on-write support, and server-side copy support.
Doesn't this imply to pass some flag to copy_file_range()? "man copy_file_range" says:
> The flags argument is provided to allow for future extensions and currently must be set to 0.
How is CoW copy supposed to be done by using copy_file_range() exactly? |
|