Message403347
| Author |
shihai1991 |
| Recipients |
petr.viktorin, seberg, shihai1991 |
| Date |
2021年10月07日.03:06:19 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1633575979.66.0.515480285344.issue45315@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> the simplest solution is calling `type_set_name`, even if that runs some unnecessary checks.
Hm, I haven't find any case who use dynamical tp_name of Type_Spec temporarily.
If we meet this user case, Adding a new object pointer of type name in is an other option maybe:) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2021年10月07日 03:06:19 | shihai1991 | set | recipients:
+ shihai1991, petr.viktorin, seberg |
| 2021年10月07日 03:06:19 | shihai1991 | set | messageid: <1633575979.66.0.515480285344.issue45315@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021年10月07日 03:06:19 | shihai1991 | link | issue45315 messages |
| 2021年10月07日 03:06:19 | shihai1991 | create |
|