Message402694
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2021年09月27日.06:31:28 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1632724288.44.0.76338200217.issue11838@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
In #45297, Steven D'Aprano suggests deleting code immediately followed by traceback. (SyntaxErrors should not be there at all -- another issue.) But should NameError, for instance, be ignore, just because user printed something? Or block removed just because it comes before print statement?
Without more feedback, I believe most would want all code actually run. If there is a Traceback, Add comment with error and message.
UI is a tough issue. I don't want to add more File menu entries and hot keys. We can add to shell context menu as have already done.
Maybe this: after getting the save name, branch on type: .py, code only; anything else, full log. Subsequent ^S saves use last save-as name to decide. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2021年09月27日 06:31:28 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, eric.araujo |
| 2021年09月27日 06:31:28 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1632724288.44.0.76338200217.issue11838@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021年09月27日 06:31:28 | terry.reedy | link | issue11838 messages |
| 2021年09月27日 06:31:28 | terry.reedy | create |
|