Message402000
| Author |
rhettinger |
| Recipients |
brandtbucher, jaraco, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2021年09月17日.03:58:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1631851119.27.0.970065286126.issue43413@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Subclass of set can now define a __new__() method with
> additional keyword parameters without overriding also __init__().
Is there any use case for this? Offhand, I can't think of any reason.
The new code in set.__init__ is somewhat opaque and is likely slower, so I prefer the previous code unless there is a legitimate use case being served. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2021年09月17日 03:58:39 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, jaraco, serhiy.storchaka, brandtbucher |
| 2021年09月17日 03:58:39 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1631851119.27.0.970065286126.issue43413@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021年09月17日 03:58:39 | rhettinger | link | issue43413 messages |
| 2021年09月17日 03:58:39 | rhettinger | create |
|