Message393576
| Author |
jaswdr |
| Recipients |
jaswdr, op368, orsenthil |
| Date |
2021年05月13日.12:37:56 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1620909476.75.0.672168333561.issue40938@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
@op368 as far as I can see, regarding of any miss interpretation, yes, the RFC has this section:
"http:g" = "http:g" ; for strict parsers
/ "http://a/b/c/g" ; for backward compatibility
What I can understand is that for "http:g" it will be translated to "http:///g" because of backward compatibility, this seems to be an edge case for the parser, since the RFC text also mention that this should be avoided. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2021年05月13日 12:37:56 | jaswdr | set | recipients:
+ jaswdr, orsenthil, op368 |
| 2021年05月13日 12:37:56 | jaswdr | set | messageid: <1620909476.75.0.672168333561.issue40938@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021年05月13日 12:37:56 | jaswdr | link | issue40938 messages |
| 2021年05月13日 12:37:56 | jaswdr | create |
|