Message392253
| Author |
ev2geny |
| Recipients |
Carl Osterwisch, Gabi.Davar, John Florian, chary314, dabrahams, davide.rizzo, dlenski, eric.araujo, eric.smith, eryksun, ethan smith, ethan.furman, ev2geny, jaraco, jwilk, martin.panter, ncoghlan, njs, paul.moore, piotr.dobrogost, pitrou, r.david.murray, sbt, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware |
| Date |
2021年04月28日.20:08:15 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1619640495.97.0.740133805435.issue14243@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:51 AM Jason R. Coombs <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Jason R. Coombs <jaraco@jaraco.com> added the comment:
> At least I and Ethan and Martin have expressed a desire for the default, preferred usage work well in a portable environment. Requiring `delete_on_close=False` violates that expectation.
Separately to my previous message. If the only issue with my PR is that default solution is not portable, then this can be simply changed within current PR by setting default of delete_on_close to fe equal to False.
As I mentioned, I was assuming I cannot break backwards compatibility. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2021年04月28日 20:08:16 | ev2geny | set | recipients:
+ ev2geny, paul.moore, jaraco, ncoghlan, pitrou, eric.smith, tim.golden, jwilk, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, njs, dabrahams, ethan.furman, davide.rizzo, sbt, Gabi.Davar, martin.panter, piotr.dobrogost, zach.ware, dlenski, eryksun, steve.dower, Carl Osterwisch, ethan smith, John Florian, chary314 |
| 2021年04月28日 20:08:15 | ev2geny | set | messageid: <1619640495.97.0.740133805435.issue14243@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021年04月28日 20:08:15 | ev2geny | link | issue14243 messages |
| 2021年04月28日 20:08:15 | ev2geny | create |
|