Message388922
| Author |
eric.snow |
| Recipients |
Mark.Shannon, eric.snow, gvanrossum, mattip, nascheme, petr.viktorin, vstinner |
| Date |
2021年03月17日.14:40:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1615992020.89.0.947811627826.issue43503@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> I am confused. How can widening the usable number of functions (i.e. using
> the whole C-API rather than the limited API) help c-extension modules be
> usable in subinterpreters? Aren't the same singletons, exception types, and
> other types exposed in the full C-API?
If Py_LIMITED_API is defined then things would stay the same. Otherwise we would replace the names with macros to do the appropriate lookup. (That isn't the whole story since the Py*_Type names are PyTypeObject and not PyObject*.) |
|