Message386140
| Author |
petr.viktorin |
| Recipients |
petr.viktorin, shihai1991, vstinner |
| Date |
2021年02月02日.13:12:53 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1612271573.38.0.235251337608.issue40601@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Sorry, I lost this bug in my TODO list :(
> > I don't think it's necessary here.
>
> Did you read my rationale (first message)? Do you mean that per-interpreter GIL is not worth it?
Right, I mean that it it is not worth breaking the C-API for all existing modules.
Instead, I think that it can be done as an addition: only modules that don't use things like these static types would be allowed in subinterpreters that have their own GIL. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2021年02月02日 13:12:53 | petr.viktorin | set | recipients:
+ petr.viktorin, vstinner, shihai1991 |
| 2021年02月02日 13:12:53 | petr.viktorin | set | messageid: <1612271573.38.0.235251337608.issue40601@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021年02月02日 13:12:53 | petr.viktorin | link | issue40601 messages |
| 2021年02月02日 13:12:53 | petr.viktorin | create |
|