Message386033
| Author |
rhettinger |
| Recipients |
LewisGaul, eric.smith, eric.snow, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2021年01月31日.18:15:07 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1612116907.43.0.500626987843.issue43080@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
At some point, we need a modern redesign alternative to pprint. It could have its own __pprint__ method to communicate how it wants to be pretty printed.
Until then, I think the existing pprint module should only grow custom support for classes that have a mostly consistent structure and usage pattern. SimpleNamespace, for example, made sense for a custom pprint handler because it is so dict like and is almost never customized.
IMO, dataclasses are a bridge too far. Having pprint() guess what a dataclass intends is not far from try to guess what an arbitrary class intends. This is skating on thin ice. |
|