Message 384110 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	vstinner
Recipients	Alexandru Ardelean, Frederik Rietdijk, Ray Donnelly, barry, benjamin.peterson, bmwiedemann, brett.cannon, dstufft, eric.araujo, eric.smith, eschwartz, jefferyto, mcepl, methane, miss-islington, sascha_silbe, vstinner
Date	2020年12月31日.12:11:15
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1609416675.09.0.105299908733.issue29708@roundup.psfhosted.org>

Content
> note the optimized .pyc is deterministic. As far as I know only __debug__ is set to False, or is there something else different? Hum, maybe there is a misunderstanding on the PEP 552 purpose. I understood that the main point of the PEP 552 is to compare hash(<source code>), rather than checking the .py and .pyc file modification time. It doesn't magically make the PYC file content fully reproducible. Correct me if I misunderstood PEP 552 as well.

Content

> note the optimized .pyc is deterministic. As far as I know only __debug__ is set to False, or is there something else different?
Hum, maybe there is a misunderstanding on the PEP 552 purpose.
I understood that the main point of the PEP 552 is to compare hash(<source code>), rather than checking the .py and .pyc file modification time.
It doesn't magically make the PYC file content fully reproducible. Correct me if I misunderstood PEP 552 as well.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020年12月31日 12:11:15	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, barry, brett.cannon, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, mcepl, eric.araujo, sascha_silbe, methane, dstufft, bmwiedemann, Frederik Rietdijk, Alexandru Ardelean, Ray Donnelly, eschwartz, miss-islington, jefferyto
2020年12月31日 12:11:15	vstinner	set	messageid: <1609416675.09.0.105299908733.issue29708@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020年12月31日 12:11:15	vstinner	link	issue29708 messages
2020年12月31日 12:11:15	vstinner	create

homepage