Message382177
| Author |
BTaskaya |
| Recipients |
BTaskaya, Mark.Shannon, christian.heimes, josh.r, mark.dickinson, pablogsal, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2020年11月30日.19:16:27 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1606763787.81.0.274424958297.issue42454@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> I have to say that I feel that this will complicate things too much. Part of the appeal of this change is how straightforward and maintainable is. Fiddling with code objects lowers the watermark.
Agreed. And I'd go for either making slices hashable as is, or rejecting this patch without implementing more hacks to the Python / messing with the compiler. |
|