Message 380388 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	martin.panter
Recipients	jaraco, martin.panter, ronaldoussoren
Date	2020年11月05日.01:05:18
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1604538318.86.0.124236252811.issue42263@roundup.psfhosted.org>

Content
Maybe this is related to (or duplicate of) Issue 37788? Python 3.7 has a regression where threads that are never joined cause leaks; previous code was written assuming you didn't need to join threads. Do you still see the leak even if you don't clear the "threads" list (change the target to a no-op), or if you never create a list in the first place?

Content

Maybe this is related to (or duplicate of) Issue 37788? Python 3.7 has a regression where threads that are never joined cause leaks; previous code was written assuming you didn't need to join threads.
Do you still see the leak even if you don't clear the "threads" list (change the target to a no-op), or if you never create a list in the first place?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020年11月05日 01:05:18	martin.panter	set	recipients: + martin.panter, ronaldoussoren, jaraco
2020年11月05日 01:05:18	martin.panter	set	messageid: <1604538318.86.0.124236252811.issue42263@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020年11月05日 01:05:18	martin.panter	link	issue42263 messages
2020年11月05日 01:05:18	martin.panter	create

homepage