Message374872
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
eric.smith, ezio.melotti, mark.dickinson, mjacob, skrah |
| Date |
2020年08月05日.11:12:17 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1596625937.24.0.376550375131.issue17336@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
The issue of changing the complex repr came up again in #41485, which has been closed as a duplicate of this issue.
See also https://bugs.python.org/issue23229#msg233963, where Guido says:
> BTW I don't want repr() of a complex number to use the complex(..., ...)
notation -- it's too verbose.
FWIW, I'd be +1 on changing the complex repr, but given Guido's opposition we're probably looking at a PEP to make that happen, and I don't have the bandwidth or the energy to push such a PEP through. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2020年08月05日 11:12:17 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, skrah, mjacob |
| 2020年08月05日 11:12:17 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1596625937.24.0.376550375131.issue17336@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020年08月05日 11:12:17 | mark.dickinson | link | issue17336 messages |
| 2020年08月05日 11:12:17 | mark.dickinson | create |
|