Message372429
| Author |
izbyshev |
| Recipients |
Yonatan Goldschmidt, gregory.p.smith, izbyshev, koobs, pablogsal, ronaldoussoren |
| Date |
2020年06月26日.15:48:04 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1593186484.43.0.717205658449.issue35823@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I'd really like to get this merged eventually because vfork()-based solution is fundamentally more generic than posix_spawn(). Apart from having no issue with close_fds=True, it will also continue to allow subprocess to add any process context tweaks without waiting for availability of corresponding features in posix_spawn().
If there is no objection from Gregory or other devs, I can pick up from where I left in two weeks. |
|