Message367671
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date |
2020年04月29日.16:10:34 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1588176634.94.0.292940103866.issue40346@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I created this issue to propose PR 19631 (BaseRandom class) which looked like as a good idea to me: simple base class which fix different kind of problems.
But it seems like other people would prefer a complete rewrite from scratch and require a PEP.
I abandonned my BaseRandom PR #19631 and my PR 19700 since there is no clear consensus on these changes. I'm not interested to write a PEP to redesign the module random.
I also close this issue as rejected. If someone wants to enhance the random module, it seems like a PEP is needed: at least, please open a separated issue.
I wrote PR #19797 "Remove C implementation of Random.randbytes()" to address initial Raymond's concern on randbytes() implementation:
https://bugs.python.org/issue40286#msg366860 |
|