Message367201
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date |
2020年04月24日.17:08:57 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1587748138.02.0.0704011714355.issue40346@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
[Victor]
> Honestly, if you consider that BaseRandom base class is not worth it, I will just abandon this idea.
It's not that I think it's not worth it (I'm not currently convinced either way). It's more that if we're going to make a change, then it's not clear to me that the particular choice in the BaseRandom PR is necessarily the only or best way to do it. There are a good few technical choices to be made, and I think there's value in having a wider discussion. |
|