Message366408
| Author |
steve.dower |
| Recipients |
carljm, corona10, eelizondo, gregory.p.smith, nascheme, pablogsal, pitrou, shihai1991, steve.dower, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date |
2020年04月14日.17:50:14 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1586886614.82.0.189451697305.issue40255@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
There hasn't been much said about which kind of objects would be immortal. Could this be a creation-time option? Or a type object (similar to a no-op tp_dealloc)?
If it's something that is known when the object is created, then some of the "infection" concern can be reduced - but if you wanted to arbitrarily make arbitrary objects immortal dynamically then it's a different matter.
Another benefit of knowing at creation time is that immortal objects could be allocated to a different page (or potentially even to read-only shared memory, if that was appropriate). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2020年04月14日 17:50:14 | steve.dower | set | recipients:
+ steve.dower, tim.peters, nascheme, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, carljm, corona10, pablogsal, eelizondo, shihai1991 |
| 2020年04月14日 17:50:14 | steve.dower | set | messageid: <1586886614.82.0.189451697305.issue40255@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020年04月14日 17:50:14 | steve.dower | link | issue40255 messages |
| 2020年04月14日 17:50:14 | steve.dower | create |
|