Message366387
| Author |
steve.dower |
| Recipients |
corona10, eelizondo, gregory.p.smith, nascheme, pablogsal, pitrou, shihai1991, steve.dower, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date |
2020年04月14日.13:55:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1586872500.97.0.19608931623.issue40255@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
>> This isn't actually about removing immortal objects, but removing *mutable*
>> objects that would be shared between subinterpreters. Making some objects
>> immortal, such as interned strings or stateless singletons, would actually
>> benefit this work, as they could then be safely shared between
>> subinterpreters.
>
> From what I understood, we simply cannot share any object (mutable or not)
> between two subinterpreters. Otherwise, we will need to put a lock on all
> Py_INCREF/Py_DECREF operation which would kill performances of running
> multiple interpreters in parallel. Join bpo-39511 discussion.
That thread consists of everyone else telling you what I've just told you. Not sure that me telling you as well is going to help ;) |
|