Message365434
| Author |
aeros |
| Recipients |
aeros, pitrou, tomMoral, vstinner |
| Date |
2020年03月31日.23:01:07 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1585695667.96.0.493194384955.issue39812@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I'm currently busy today, but I'll have some time to explore a few different potential solutions tomorrow. If I can't find anything to fix it by the end of the day, I'll prepare a PR to revert PR-19149, and re-apply it later (after more thoroughly testing to ensure it doesn't cause refleaks).
Since I authored the PR, I'd like to take responsibility for addressing the refleak, whether that's reverting the PR or adding a fix on top of it.
Would that be acceptable Victor, or will it need to be reverted sooner than tomorrow? If it needs to be done sooner, I can open a PR to revert it later tonight (in ~4 hours or so, when I'm available to do so). This the first time a patch of mine has introduced a regression, so I wanted to double check that tomorrow was okay. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2020年03月31日 23:01:08 | aeros | set | recipients:
+ aeros, pitrou, vstinner, tomMoral |
| 2020年03月31日 23:01:07 | aeros | set | messageid: <1585695667.96.0.493194384955.issue39812@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020年03月31日 23:01:07 | aeros | link | issue39812 messages |
| 2020年03月31日 23:01:07 | aeros | create |
|