Message364469
| Author |
larry |
| Recipients |
Mark.Shannon, eric.snow, jeremy.kloth, jkloth, larry, maciej.szulik, nanjekyejoannah, ncoghlan, phsilva, rhettinger, shihai1991, vstinner |
| Date |
2020年03月17日.18:17:23 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1584469043.32.0.622554823246.issue39511@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> The problem with having a single immortal `None`, is that it will
> cause data cache thrashing as two different CPUs modify the
> refcount on the shared `None` object.
That's a very reasonable theory. Personally, I find modern CPU architecture bewildering and unpredictable. So I'd prefer it if somebody tests such performance claims, rather than simply asserting them and having that be the final design. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2020年03月17日 18:17:23 | larry | set | recipients:
+ larry, rhettinger, ncoghlan, vstinner, jkloth, phsilva, jeremy.kloth, Mark.Shannon, eric.snow, maciej.szulik, nanjekyejoannah, shihai1991 |
| 2020年03月17日 18:17:23 | larry | set | messageid: <1584469043.32.0.622554823246.issue39511@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020年03月17日 18:17:23 | larry | link | issue39511 messages |
| 2020年03月17日 18:17:23 | larry | create |
|