Message363217
| Author |
gregory.p.smith |
| Recipients |
Sriram Rajagopalan, belopolsky, gregory.p.smith, nickzoic, p-ganssle, polymorphm, xtreak |
| Date |
2020年03月02日.23:33:48 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1583192028.83.0.38070803063.issue26460@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I _doubt_ there is code expecting the default year when unspecified to actually be 1900.
Change that default to any old year with a leap year (1904?) and it'll still (a) stand out as a special year that can be looked up should it wind up being _used_ as the year in code somewhere and (b) not fail every four years for people just parsing to extract Month + Day values. |
|