Message362731
| Author |
Elad Lahav |
| Recipients |
Elad Lahav, dstufft, eric.araujo, gvanrossum, p-ganssle, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date |
2020年02月26日.20:10:06 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1582747806.61.0.29363182759.issue39763@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I'm not convinced that a multi-threaded fork()+exec() from C would be any better, unless the Python code goes to great lengths to avoid any non-async-signal-safe operations between the fork() and the exec().
So along with the proposed change to switch to the subprocess() module I would like to propose that that module switch to using posix_spawn() instead of fork()+exec(). |
|